Constitution And National Soul Essay Example For Students

Constitution And National Soul Essay A constitution really only reflects the type of people who wrote it, the timeperoid when written and the people over time who will find ways to exploit it. Although we are raised to believe that a constitution is the greatest thingsince sliced bread, there are many flaws. Section 2.1 (d) of the Aug. 28, 1992Constitutional Accord states: Canadians and their governments arecommitted to the vitality and development of official language minoritycommunities throughout Canada. Except in 2.1(b) concearning nativelanguges, all other languges are delibertely left out. This is utterly andcompletely racist. This leaves out millions of Canadians and turns them intosecond class citizens. It would be more appropiate to have officalreplaced with white. How can we preach equality if were not equal. If we left no room for racisim in our constitution we would have the wordofficial replaced with working since it is neutral butstill recognizes that French and English are the most dominant languges. However, the Canadian constitution is not alone in its racisim. When theAmerican constitution was written to uphold equality for all and the freedom topursue happiness, were the blacks of the country involved. No, of course not. The constitution refleceted only the white peoples values at the time. Thepeople who wrote it. Which brings me to my next point. Written constitutionsprimarly are flawed since they cant evolve with the nation. They usuallyrepresent ignorant views that are no longer relevent to modern society. How goodwill our constitution be in two hundred years? How good will it be in fivehundred years? A good example of this would be the American right to bear arms. This initially was in order to protect themselves from the British and probablymade perfect sense, at the time. But now this is totally absurd. People have tolive in fear and protect themselves, ironically enough, with guns because thereare so many out there. There are school shootings it seems once every month andputting control on guns is nearly impossible because it is protected by theconstitution. This correlates directly with my last point. Writing aconstitution gives practically total immunity to every (Warning!! Good GuliversTravels symbolisim about to be injected.) yahoo out there. The biggest exampleof this is the N.R.A., despite some good promotion by Charlton Heston. They havethe right to bear todays most deadly assualt weapons because they know they canhide behind the all powerful constitution. The constitution in the U.S. isexploited so a bunch of rednecks can play with their guns. All attempts ofcontrol on these weapons is continually knocked down because it isunconstit utional. Hell, that part of the American constitution will probablynever change. Which shows just what kind of damage can be done with theconstitution. All my contempteous arguing can be summed up in this: Aconstitution is a mirror attempting to reflect the national soul. Thisleaves room for inevitable error but ensures that we are forever continuing toimprove our constitution. Government